Saturday, September 6, 2008

Kamtz and Bar Kamtza - Gittin 56

In Daf Yomi we just covered one of the most famous stories in the Gmara - kamtza and Bar Kamtza.

I'm sure that all my readers are familiar with the story, in case you're not, feel free to look it up on Wikipedia or on the OU's website.

A number of years ago I remember hearing an interesting take on the story. The G'mara starts off by saying that "It was because of 'Kamtza and Bar-Kamtza' that Yerushalayim was destroyed" - it is easy to see how Bar Kamtza was responsible for the destruction of Yerushalayim, but how was Kamtz responsible? He wasn't even there.

The Maharal asks this question, and you're welcome to look at his answer, however I heard a different approach from Rav natan Segal (I don't remember if he quoted this approach in the name of someone else).

Kamtza was not at the party to begin with - that is why the host of the party had to send someone to call him. The unasked question is WHERE was Kamtza - why wasn't he at his close friend's party? We don't know why the party was being held, but presumably he was celebrating an event such as a Brit or a Wedding - how could Kamtza have a close friend celebrating an important event and not take the time to even show up?

That is the antithesis of ואהבתה לרעך כמוך that you don't take an interest of care about your own friends. This lack of true friendship on behalf of Kamtza may seem trivial, but it started a series of events that lead to the destruction of Yerushalayim.

Now that Elul is upon us, lets all start worrying about each other a little more, and maybe we can start a series of events that will see Yerushalayim returned to her former glory.

Shvua Tov

5 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
סֵפֶר "Bar Kamtza. 2007" said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
סֵפֶר "Bar Kamtza. 2007" said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
סֵפֶר "Bar Kamtza. 2007" said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
סֵפֶר "Bar Kamtza. 2007" said...

Any conclusions - even when they are the intelligent and important - when they are based on the literal meaning (פשט) of the legend - they causes disaster!

We MUST DECRYPT the literal meaning of the legends of the Talmud!

Kamtza and Bar Kamtza - who are they really???

The answer is here (in Hebrew):
https://barkamtza2007.blogspot.com/ncr
https://barkamtza2007.wordpress.com/
or (with some additions):
http://cafe.themarker.com/post/2999984

The true meaning of the Sinat Chinam concept is explained in the document called
חמישה קטעים על המילה בריון
on this site: goo.gl/2SxSUy


In addition, I offer you a site with examples of a completely absurd reading of texts of Mekoros. These readings are completely distorting the meaning of the MESSAGES which the Authors of the Mekoros have wanted to convey to us - and these examples are only a little drop in the endless sea of worst cases of intentionally wrong transcriptions / interpretations of the Mekoros.
(Among other things, this site offers, for example, the original meaning of the Sinat Chinam concept and of the Biryon concept)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism_of_TALMUD